Edmund Husserl's Reception in Marvin Farber's <i>Philosophy and Phenomenological Research</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article provides insight into the early history of the journal Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (PPR), which was founded by Marvin Farber in conjunction with the International Society of Phenomenology, particularly as it concerns the editorial struggles to remain faithful to the work of Edmund Husserl. The PPR was intended as a continuation of the Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, which was the first philosophical platform for phenomenology. Many of Husserl's students who first published in the Jahrbuch formed the original editorial staff of Farber's journal and were dedicated to maintaining the spirit of phenomenology's founder in the journal. This commitment would be mitigated by the pragmatic temperament of American philosophy that Marvin Farber found in William James.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".