MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026852528 · doi:10.4021/jcgo.v1i2-3.26

Recent Incidence of Trisomy 21 in a Japanese Hospital

2012· article· en· W2026852528 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shunji Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrisomyMedicineSingletonIncidence (geometry)ObstetricsGestationAdvanced maternal agePregnancyPediatricsFetusGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trisomy 21, the chromosome abnormality responsible for over 95% of Down syndrome, is one of the most common conditions encountered in the genetic clinic. Recently, the increasing share of pregnancies with advanced maternal age and its impact on the increased incidence of trisomy 21 have been reported in the United States [1-3]. Our hospital is one of main perinatal centers in Tokyo, Japan (about 2,100 deliveries per year). In this study, we examined the recent incidence of trisomy 21 associated with maternal age at our hospital. We reviewed the obstetric records of all Japanese singleton pregnancies at our hospital form January 2005 through January 2011. Demographic information and the characteristics of labor were extracted from patient charts. The conditions of the study patients were Japanese singleton pregnancies whose estimated date of delivery were from January 2006 through December 2011 and managed from 14 weeks or earlier at our hospital. In this study, thus, we have excluded the cases as follows (1) multifetal pregnancies, (2) non-Japanese pregnancies, (3) the time of first visit of our hospital at ≥ 15 weeks’ gestation, and/or (4) spontaneous fetal demise before 22 weeks’ gestation. We examined the maternal age at age of the estimated date of delivery. There were 28 cases of trisomy 21 in 10964 Japanese singleton pregnancies (1/392). In our hospital, there were 39 cases of trisomy 21 in total during this period; however, there were 8 cases of trisomy 21 refereed to our hospital at ≥ 15 weeks’ gestation due to fetal abnormality, 2 non-Japanese cases of trisomy 21 and 1 case of trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy. During this period, the average maternal age of all pregnancies was 32.3 ± 5.5 years old and 35% of the mothers were 35 years old or more at the estimated date of delivery; while the average maternal age in the cases with trisomy 21 was 38.0 ± 4.7 years old. The incidence of trisomy 21 in cases of maternal age of < 35 years (3 cases, average: 27.7 ± 3.5 years), 35 39 years (15 cases, average: 37.5 ± 1.1 years) and ≥ 40 years (10 cases, average: 41.7 ± 1.9 years) were 1/2364, 1/209 and 1/74, respectively. These incidences by maternal age were almost similar to those reported previously in the United States [4]. Of the 28 cases of trisomy 21, 11 cases (39%) were diagnosed as trisomy 21 prenatally using amniocentesis due to maternal request. Ten cases of them (91%) were artificial aborted; thus, the incidence of live births with trisomy 21 was 1/608 (18 cases). The average maternal age in the cases diagnosed prenatally was significant higher than that diagnosed postnatelly (40.1 ± 3.3 vs. 36.6 ± 5.0 years, p < 0.01 by unpaired t-test). The tendency is also similar to that reported in the United States [1-3]. In conclusion, in Japan the recent increased share of pregnancies with advanced maternal age seemed to contribute to the increased incidence of trisomy 21 as observed in other countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207