MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026903655 · doi:10.1680/gein.9.0218

Subsidence Evaluation of Geotextilereinforced Gravel Mats Bridging a Sinkhole

2002· article· en· W2026903655 on OpenAlexafffund
H.B. Poorooshasb

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSinkholeGeotextileGeotechnical engineeringReinforcementGeologyCompactionGeosyntheticsSubsidenceEngineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compacted gravel mats, reinforced with layers of geosynthetic, are often used in areas prone to the occurrence of sinkholes. The purpose of the geosynthetic reinforcement is to bridge the cavities formed by the sinkholes. Since compaction of the overlying gravel inevitably involves the possibility of damaging the reinforcement, as well as higher costs, it is desirable to have a method of analysis that will provide a balance between cost and the best technical design. That is, enable the engineer to choose between a less compact gravel mat with a higher degree of reinforcement versus a more compact gravel mat containing less reinforcement. The present paper shows that, for a very dense gravel mat, geotextile reinforcement acts solely as a separator (it prevents the caving of the material into the sinkhole). For medium dense gravel mats, and gravel mats with a minimum degree of compaction, the geotextile reinforcement plays a more significant role in reducing the settlement at the surface of the gravel mat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosynthetics InternationalSame topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207