MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026906329 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.024021

Branch cut and quasinormal modes at large imaginary frequency in Schwarzschild space-time

2012· article· en· W2026906329 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Casals, Adrian C. Ottewill

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuasinormal modeComplex planeSchwarzschild radiusSpacetimeSchwarzschild metricMathematical physicsImaginary timePerturbation (astronomy)Analytic continuationQuantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsMathematical analysisQuantumMathematicsGravitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The retarded Green function for fields propagating on a Schwarzschild black hole space-time possesses a branch cut on the complex-frequency plane. Classically, the branch cut is important, for example, in order to fully determine the response of the black hole to a linear field perturbation. The branch cut is also useful for the calculation of the self-force on a point particle moving in the Schwarzschild background. In this paper we use techniques of analytic continuation to the complex plane of the radial coordinate in order to calculate the branch cut contribution to the Green function in the limit of large imaginary frequency. It is expected that the contribution of this frequency regime to the perturbation response and to the self-force will be mostly for short time intervals. We also determine the highly damped quasinormal mode frequencies for electromagnetic perturbations in Schwarzschild for the first time (previously only the leading imaginary part was known). We find that these frequencies behave like ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\ensuremath{\ell}n}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{in}{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{i[\ensuremath{\ell}(\ensuremath{\ell}+1){]}^{2}}{2n}+\frac{{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{1/2}(1\ensuremath{-}i)[\ensuremath{\ell}(\ensuremath{\ell}+1){]}^{3}}{{2}^{3/2}{n}^{3/2}}+O({n}^{\ensuremath{-}2})$. The highly damped quasinormal modes are particularly interesting for theories of quantum gravity in that they are believed to probe the small scale structure of the space-time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207