MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026948555 · doi:10.1155/s0161171200002362

Decomposition conditions for two‐point boundary value problems

2000· article· en· W2026948555 on OpenAlexaff
Wenying Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDecompositionValue (mathematics)Boundary value problemBoundary valuesPoint (geometry)Pure mathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsGeometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the solvability of the equation x″ = f(t, x, x′) subject to Dirichlet, Neumann, periodic, and antiperiodic boundary conditions. Under the assumption that f can be suitably decomposed, we prove approximation solvability results for the above equation by applying the abstract continuation type theorem of Petryshyn on A‐proper mappings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical SciencesSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207