MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026999980 · doi:10.1615/atomizspr.v17.i1.30

EDGE INSTABILITY AND VELOCITY OF LIQUID SHEETS FORMED BY TWO IMPINGING JETS

2007· article· en· W2026999980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAtomization and Sprays · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupInstabilityMechanicsMaterials scienceCapillary actionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFlow visualizationBreak-UpOpticsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental investigation into the instabilities that occur on the edges of liquid sheets formed by the impingement of two capillary liquid jets is conducted. The breakup of the droplets from the edges of the sheet is investigated by using direct visualization. It is found that beadlike formations appear on the edges of the sheet, and they grow until they break up into drops. The instability causing this breakup is referred to as the edge instability. The process of the droplet formation is divided into two stages: the growing stage and the detaching stage. The velocity of the small-sized attached drops on the edges of the sheet is determined, which is assumed to represent the fluid velocity on the edges of the sheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it