MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027027043 · doi:10.1117/12.840752

High-power fiber lasers with integrated rare-earth optical cooler

2009· article· en· W2027027043 on OpenAlexaff
Galina Nemova, Raman Kashyap

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber laserLaserOptical fiberOptoelectronicsPower (physics)Materials scienceComputer scienceSemiconductor laser theoryOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-power lasers (Raman and traditional solid-state) suffer from heat generated by the quantum defect, which deteriorates their performance. The radiation-balanced technique was proposed to solve the problem in the case of solid-state lasers, and the intrinsic heat-mitigation technique, which relies on coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) was proposed to solve the problem of heat generation in the high power Raman laser. Unfortunately radiated energy increases only linearly with the length of the laser medium in both schemes. We propose a radically new approach to solve the problem of heat generation in lasers. We have considered athermal fiber lasers, where rare-earth (RE) ions based refrigeration sources are incorporated in the body of the devices. This new technique, which has been developed for Raman and traditional solid-state lasers, ensures the exponential growth of radiation along the laser medium and provides almost athermal operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materialsFrench-language works237,207