MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027041011 · doi:10.1517/13543776.17.3.277

Therapeutic advances in the treatment of osteoporosis

2007· article· en· W2027041011 on OpenAlexaff
Julian Mathoo, Lisa Becker, Dinesh Kumbhare, Jonathan D. Adachi

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisMedicineStrontium ranelateAnabolic AgentsBisphosphonateTeriparatidePharmacologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineBone mineral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until recently, pharmacological options for the treatment of osteoporosis have been limited to antiresorptive agents, including the oral bisphosphonates. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses support the efficacy and safety of oral bisphosphonates as first-line pharmacologic agents in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, advances in parenteral bisphosphonate therapy, the development of antireceptor activator of NF-κB ligand (anti-RANKL) therapy, the development of anabolic agents, namely parathyroid hormone and related peptides, as well as the emergence of strontium ranelate as a novel therapeutic agent with both anabolic and antiresporptive properties, have dramatically expanded our pharmacologic armamentarium of antiosteoporosis treatments. Effective treatment options now exist for patients in whom older agents were either contraindicated or not tolerated. This review will focus on recent developments in osteoporosis treatments in advanced phases of development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207