MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027041306 · doi:10.3406/geoca.2001.2576

Redistribution de l'emploi et territoires métropolitains : la recomposition du péri-urbain en Amérique du Nord / Employment redistribution and metropolitan territories : the restructuring of periurban zones in North America

2001· article· fr· W2027041306 on OpenAlex
Claude Manzagol, William J. Coffey, Richard Shearmur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéocarrefour · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesRedistribution (election)GeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La rapide transformation des métropoles ne saurait se comprendre hors de l'analyse de la redistribution de l'emploi qui rend caducs les rapports traditionnels entre le centre-ville et les banlieues. L'agglomération d'activités centrales dans des noyaux périphériques engendre une forme et une dynamique urbaines différentes. Toutefois, des indices de dispersion généralisée de l'emploi invitent à se demander si l'organisation polycentrique est un modèle durable d'organisation métropolitaine ou une cristallisation éphémère. Une analyse de la répartition de l'emploi et de son évolution entre 1981 et 1996 permet de tester ces hypothèses pour les métropoles canadiennes, et de réfléchir au poids des facteurs politiques et culturels dans l'émergence des nouveaux modèles d'organisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it