MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027075424 · doi:10.1118/1.1781331

Automatic measurements of image geometry for online calibration of C‐arm fluoroscopy

2004· article· en· W2027075424 on OpenAlexaff
Neculai Archip, Robert Rohling

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNIH Clinical Center
KeywordsFluoroscopyFiducial markerCalibrationRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage registrationGeometryComputer visionRADIUSImage (mathematics)MathematicsMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calibrated C-arm fluoroscopy is used for a variety of surgical procedures where surgical tools and anatomical structures need to be located in space. Calibration can be performed online by combining measurements of the geometry of the image (center and radius) with measurements of a grid of fiducial markers. This article focuses on the first aspect--image geometry--and describes a method to perform the geometry measurements automatically. The accuracy, robustness, and speed of the method are validated on 100 images obtained from several hospitals with different C-arm scanners. All 100 images were successfully measured with an average error of 0.8 mm for the center and 0.8 mm for the radius. The execution time is less than one second per image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207