A new angle to mandibular reconstruction: The scapular tip free flap
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the scapular tip free flap for mandibular reconstruction, describe the surgical approach, and highlight specific clinical applications. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing oromandibular reconstruction using a scapular tip free flap at the London Health Sciences Centre was undertaken. Patient demographics, surgical data, and early outcomes were collated. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. The majority involved mandibular angle and short segment defects (16 of 20). Average length of the segmental defect was 6.2 cm with the longest measuring 8 cm. A single patient required an osteotomy. Six were revision cases. No vein grafts were required. One complete flap failure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The natural scapular angle makes the scapular tip flap ideal for mandibular angle reconstruction. Short bone segments can be harvested with little donor-site morbidity. The long pedicle length may obviate vein grafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it