Des salons aux annales : les réseaux et associations des femmes de lettres à Montréal au tournant du XXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au tournant du XXe siècle, la convergence du développement urbain, économique et médiatique favorise un accroissement significatif du nombre de femmes de lettres canadiennes-françaises et crée des conditions favorables à leur percée dans la sphère publique. Les conséquences de ces mutations sociales sur les pratiques associatives en général et sur celles des femmes de lettres en particulier sont importantes. Si la participation des femmes à la grande majorité des regroupements et associations formels et publics de la période suscite des résistances, on constate que les femmes de lettres revendiquent leur voix au chapitre des grands rassemblements et s'initient aux pratiques associatives publiques en formant leurs propres réseaux de solidarités et d'influence. L'étude des activités des femmes de lettres au sein du Conseil national des femmes du Canada, de la Fédération nationale Saint-Jean-Baptiste, puis des cercles d'études pour jeunes filles, révèle l'importance des réseaux et solidarités dans les trajectoires des écrivaines de l'époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".