Correlation between brain bradykinin receptor binding sites and cardiovascular function in young and adult spontaneously hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) effects of bradykinin (BK) B(1) and B(2) receptor agonists and antagonists were assessed on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in awake unrestrained spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, aged of 8 and 16 weeks) and age-matched Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY). Quantitative in vitro autoradiographic studies were also performed on the brain of both strains with specific radioligands for B(2) receptors [(125)I]HPP-Hoe 140 and B(1) receptors [(125)I]HPP-des-Arg(10) and Hoe140. MAP increased linearly with doses of BK (81-8100 pmol) and the amplitudes were significantly greater in SHR, particularly at 16 weeks. While BK evoked a negative linear trend on HR (bradycardia) in WKY, a positive one (tachycardia) was observed in adult SHR. In both strains, BK-induced pressor response was blocked by equimolar doses of B(2) receptor antagonist, D-Arg-[Hyp(3), Thi(5), D-Tic(7), Oic(8)]-BK (Hoe 140), but not by B(1) receptor antagonist, AcLys[D-betaNal(7), Ile(8)]des-Arg(9)-BK (R-715). B(1) receptor agonists (Sar-[D-Phe(8)]-des-Arg(9)-BK, des-Arg(9)-BK, des-Arg(10)-Kallidin) and antagonist (R-715 alone or with Hoe 140) had no or marginal effect on MAP and HR at doses up to 8100 pmol in SHR and WKY. Higher densities of specific [(125)I]HPP-Hoe 140 labelling were found in discrete brain areas of SHR, especially in regions associated with cardiovascular function. Low levels of [(125)I]HPP-[des-Arg(10)]-Hoe140 binding sites were seen in WKY and SHR, yet densities were significantly greater in midbrain and cortical regions of SHR aged of 16 weeks. Contrary to SHR, ageing caused a downregulation of B(2) and B(1) receptor binding sites in specific brain nuclei in WKY. It is concluded that the hypersensitivity of the pressor response to i.c.v. BK in SHR occurs during both the early and established phases of hypertension in parallel with the enhancement of B(2) receptor binding sites in various cardiovascular brain centres. In contrast, brain B(1) receptors do not seem to participate in the central pressor effects of kinins nor in the maintenance of hypertension in SHR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".