MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027129310 · doi:10.1109/mmsp.2012.6343456

Bimodal Discriminant Projection Analysis for gait recognition

2012· article· en· W2027129310 on OpenAlexaff
Shanwen Zhang, Xiao–Ping Zhang, Chuanlei Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Linear discriminant analysisArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceProjection (relational algebra)DiscriminantKernel (algebra)Dimensionality reductionGaitSimilarity (geometry)Matrix (chemical analysis)Kernel Fisher discriminant analysisSupport vector machineMathematicsMinimaxAlgorithmMathematical optimizationFacial recognition systemImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As for gait recognition, we propose a new discriminant dimensionality reduction method, named Bimodal Discriminant Projection Analysis (BDPA) algorithm. In BDPA, a weight path-based similarity measure is designed, the intra-class scatter matrix is constructed by the weight, while the inter-class scatter matrix is constructed by the heat kernel function. Compared with the classical methods, such as Multimodal Preserving Embedding (MPE) and Minimax Risk Criterion methods, the proposed method can preserve within-class neighborhood geometry and extract between-class relevant structures for recognition by minimizing the intra-class scatter and maximizing the inter-class scatter. The experimental results on real-world gait data show that BDPA is effective and feasible for gait recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207