MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027139013 · doi:10.1029/2000jc000212

An Arctic Ocean cold core eddy

2000· article· en· W2027139013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robin D. Muench, John T. Gunn, Terry E. Whitledge, Peter Schlösser, William M. Smethie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution
KeywordsHaloclineGeologyCanada BasinOceanographyEddyArcticSea iceArctic ice packClimatologySalinityMeteorologyTurbulenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed physical and chemical observations were obtained during September 1997 of a cold core eddy situated in the southern central Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean. The eddy was about 20 km in diameter, had maximum current speeds exceeding 20 cm s−1, and extended from the base of the upper mixed layer, near 40 m, down to ∼400 m. Excess salt in the eddy core was consistent with addition of brine from ∼1 m of ice formation. Core tracer distributions indicated a lifetime exceeding 1 year and were consistent with an origin as near‐surface Pacific water with some admixed terrestrial runoff. The eddy was probably formed in association with a polynya along the Alaskan Chukchi Sea coast through local water densification from surface ice formation followed by development of frontal instabilities. Formation and subsequent migration of such eddies, which may have lifetimes of several years, provide a mechanism for transporting water from the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea coastal and shelf regions into the interior Canada Basin and for contributing to maintenance of the permanent halocline. Present light ice conditions throughout the Arctic Ocean favor the formation of such eddies and may contribute to enhanced ventilation of the halocline waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207