Early Manifestations of Postnatal Hyperoxia on the Retinal Structure and Function of the Neonatal Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Postnatal hyperoxia in rats causes an arrest in growth of retinal blood vessels, along with severe changes in retinal ultrastructure and function. Previous studies focused on consequences of postnatal hyperoxia at time points substantially removed from the hyperoxic insult. In this study, the earliest manifestations of this retinopathy were examined. METHODS: Newborn rats were exposed to 80% O(2) from birth to postnatal day 14. The retinas were collected for vascular assessment at postnatal days 6, 9, 12, and 14, and electroretinograms were recorded at postnatal days 15, 16, 17, 19, 24, 30, and 60, after which retinal histology was performed. RESULTS: Hyperoxia significantly attenuated vascular development, especially after 6 and 9 days of exposure which resulted in 64% and 72% of normal coverage, respectively. Vascular growth continued despite hyperoxic exposure, reaching 87% of normal by postnatal day 14. Electroretinograms of hyperoxic rats retained very immature features throughout with nearly abolished b-waves and relatively preserved a-waves. Finally, while retinal structure was virtually complete in the control animals by postnatal day 15, hyperoxic rats always showed a significantly thinner outer plexiform layer (OPL) and lower horizontal cell count (P < 0.05), irrespective of the duration of exposure. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm previous reports of reduced retinal vascular coverage that accompanies the earliest manifestation of postnatal hyperoxia in rats and suggest increased retinal susceptibility to hyperoxia within the first week of life. However, despite the fact that vasculature appears to repair itself, irreversible cytoarchitectural and functional changes occur, the consequences of which are documented immediately after the cessation of hyperoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".