MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027184631 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2013.6760633

A convex approach to stabilization of sampled-data piecewise affine slab systems

2013· article· en· W2027184631 on OpenAlexaff
Miad Moarref, Luís Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvex optimizationControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)PiecewiseMathematicsExponential stabilityStability (learning theory)Regular polygonPiecewise linear functionSlabSampling (signal processing)Exponential functionLinear matrix inequalityApplied mathematicsNonlinear systemMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses exponential stability and stabilization of piecewise affine (PWA) slab systems with piecewise linear (PWL) sampled-data feedback. The PWL controller is assumed to be located in the feedback loop between a sampler with an unknown nonuniform sampling rate and a zero-order-hold. Convex Krasovskii-based sufficient conditions are proposed for exponential stability and stabilization of the sampled-data PWA slab system. The main contributions of this paper are twofold. First, the direct sampled-data controller synthesis problem for PWA slab systems is formulated as a convex optimization program with the maximum allowable sampling period as a parameter. Second, sufficient conditions for exponential stability of PWA sampled-data systems are presented. The stability analysis and controller synthesis conditions are cast as linear matrix inequalities. The results are successfully applied to a unicycle path following problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207