MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027211622 · doi:10.1021/ja042560u

An<sup>15</sup>N NMR Spin Relaxation Dispersion Study of the Folding of a Pair of Engineered Mutants of Apocytochrome<i>b</i><sub>562</sub>

2005· article· en· W2027211622 on OpenAlexaff
Wing‐Yiu Choy, Zheng Zhou, Yawen Bai, Lewis E. Kay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFolding (DSP implementation)Relaxation (psychology)Arrhenius equationProtein foldingKineticsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyDispersion (optics)Phi value analysisDownhill foldingThermodynamicsCrystallographyChemical physicsPhysical chemistryStereochemistryActivation energyPhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15N relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy has been used to study exchange dynamics in a pair of mutants of Rd-apocyt b562, a redesigned four-helix-bundle protein. An analysis of the relaxation data over a range of temperatures establishes that exchange in both proteins is best modeled as two-state and that it derives from the folding/unfolding transition. These results are in accord with predictions based on the reaction coordinate for the folding of the protein determined from native-state hydrogen exchange data [Chu, R.; Pei, W.; Takei, J.; Bai, Y. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 7998-8003]. The kinetics and thermodynamics of the folding transition have been characterized in detail. Although only a narrow range of temperatures could be examined, it is clear that the folding rate temperature profile is distinctly non-Arrhenius for both mutants, with the folding barrier for at least one of them entropic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207