MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027215338 · doi:10.1063/1.3567438

Hilbert Space of the Bicomplex Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

2011· article· en· W2027215338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsHarmonic oscillatorEigenfunctionHilbert spaceHamiltonian (control theory)Hermite polynomialsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsQuantum harmonic oscillatorBasis (linear algebra)MathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bicomplex numbers are pairs of complex numbers with a multiplication law that makes them a commutative ring. The problem of the quantum harmonic oscillator is investigated in the framework of bicomplex numbers. Starting with the commutator of the bicomplex position and momentum operators, we find eigenvalues and eigenkets of the bicomplex harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian. Coordinate‐basis eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian are then obtained in terms of hyperbolic Hermite polynomials, and some of them are graphically illustrated. These eigenfunctions form a basis of an infinite‐dimensional module over bicomplex numbers, and this module can be given the structure of a bicomplex Hilbert space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it