MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027222110 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n3p101

Supportive care of palliative chemotherapy for advanced stage lung cancer patients: Summary for the daily practice

2013· article· en· W2027222110 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Veronika Müller, Krisztina Vincze, Zahorecz Gabriella, Anikó Bohács, Lilla Tamási

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerChemotherapyIntensive care medicinePalliative careQuality of life (healthcare)DiseasePalliative chemotherapyStage (stratigraphy)OncologyClinical PracticeInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supportive care during palliative chemotherapy of advanced stage lung cancer is essential to enable successful control of the disease. Active oncologic treatment most often used in lung cancer has many side effects which may impair patients’ quality of life and compromise the effectiveness of therapy. Most side effects of chemotherapy are preventable or treatable with optimal supportive care which enhances success in patient care. The aim of this review is to summarize the most important conditions that may be associated with palliative chemotherapy of advanced stag lung cancer, their prevention or treatment from the daily clinical point of view, with additional special focus on the important role of oncology nurses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207