<i>AKARI</i>INFRARED OBSERVATIONS OF THE SUPERNOVA REMNANT G292.0+1.8: UNVEILING CIRCUMSTELLAR MEDIUM AND SUPERNOVA EJECTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the results of AKARI observations of the O-rich supernova remnant (SNR) G292.0+1.8 using six Infrared Camera (IRC) and four Far-Infrared Surveyor bands covering 2.7–26.5 μm and 50–180 μm, respectively. The AKARI images show two prominent structures; a bright equatorial ring (ER) structure along the east–west direction and an outer elliptical shell structure surrounding the remnant. The ER structure is clumpy and incomplete with its western end opened. The outer shell is almost complete and slightly squeezed along the north–south direction. The central position of the outer shell is ∼1' northwest from the embedded pulsar and coincides with the center of the ER structure. In the northern and southwestern regions, there is also faint emission with a sharp boundary beyond the bright shell structure. The ER and the elliptical shell structures were partly visible in optical and/or X-rays, but they are much more clearly revealed in our AKARI images. There is no evident difference in infrared colors of the two prominent structures, which is consistent with the previous proposition that both structures are of circumstellar origin. However, we have detected faint infrared emission of a considerably high 15/24 μm ratio associated with the supernova (SN) ejecta in the southeastern and northwestern areas. Our IRC spectra show that the high ratio is at least partly due to the emission lines from Ne ions in the SN ejecta material. In addition, we detect a narrow, elongated feature outside the SNR shell. We derive the physical parameters of the infrared-emitting dust grains in the shocked circumstellar medium (CSM) and compare the result with model calculations of dust destruction by an SN shock. The AKARI results suggest that the progenitor was at the center of the infrared circumstellar shell in the red supergiant stage and that the observed asymmetry in the SN ejecta could be a result of either a dense CSM in the equatorial plane and/or an asymmetric explosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".