MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027225040 · doi:10.1080/02722010609481412

BOOK REVIEW ESSAY

2006· article· en· W2027225040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William H. Katerberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryImmigrationTheme (computing)PopulationCapitalismEconomic historyMedia studiesSociologyClassicsLawPolitical sciencePoliticsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R. Douglas Francis, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. Origins: History to Confederation, 5th ed. Scarborough, ON: Nelson, 2004. xxi + 493 pp. $56.95 paper. R. Douglas Francis, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. Destinies: History Since Confederation, 5th ed. Scarborough, ON: Nelson, 2004. xx + 586 pp. $56.95 paper. R. Douglas Francis, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. Journeys: A History of Canada. Scarborough, ON: Nelson, 2004. xxv + 630 pp. $56.95 paper. The central theme Origins/Destinies and Journeys--the two-volume and one-volume versions of Francis, Jones, and Smith's history of Canada--is continuity amidst change. Although Canada has undergone immense change, the authors conclude, in many respects the basic themes of the country's history remain operative today. The proportions are different, but four major groups continue to make up Canada's population: Native peoples, French-speaking Canadians, English-speaking Canadians, and immigrants (Journeys 596). Likewise, French-English conflict, relations with the First Nations, regionalism, intergovernmental affairs, and the influence of external metropolitan centers continue to define the peculiarly Canadian features of the country's history. However much Canada has shared with the rest of the world--in terms of the global impact of capitalism, the industrial revolution, imperialism, transoceanic migration, consumerism, TV the Internet, and the emergence of postindustrial societies--these factors make its story distinct and interesting. They also make it difficult to tell. Francis, Jones, and Smith's series thus deserves praise for its overall success meeting this challenge. The two-volume Origins/Destinies is a mature textbook, now its fifth edition. Its careful approach to the demands of writing a history textbook--in both pointing to a common Canadian story and giving proper due to diverse peoples and regions--will effectively serve a variety of approaches to survey courses. Origins/Destinies is confident its depiction and interpretation of the various elements of history, with a core political and economic narrative and adequate coverage of social and cultural topics. In addition, it is generally balanced, fair-minded, and clear its treatment of controversial issues. No textbook series can cover all the relevant issues, or please people of all historiographical persuasions, but this one is irenic enough to serve most. That said, there always are things to reconsider for the next edition. One general suggestion is to include a bit more comparative commentary and coverage, particularly of the United States and other colonial societies (and, later, independent nations) Central and South America. These or New World societies shared such experiences as imperialist frontier conflict with Aboriginal peoples; slavery; the transfer, mutation, and intermingling of Old World inheritances; and, as settler societies, mass immigration from Europe (and, to a lesser extent, Asia) during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Such comparisons need not take up large amounts of space, but they would help to further contextualize the story, especially for American students. A second suggestion relates to the ancillary features of the series and their connection to the general narrative. Some of the entries work better than others. In particular, some of the Where Historians Disagree essays fall flat, because they do not adequately convey the significance of why the historians disagree (they have a she said, he said quality), or because the disagreements seem detached from the larger chapter. Students may become frustrated by the lack of clear relevance and learn to skip over them. The authors might cut some of these entries, add material to others, and general more effectively (i.e., more overtly) connect them to their own narrative and interpretive choices the larger text. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2670.172

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207