Un, deux, trois... bistouri. Technologie, symbolisme et rapports sociaux en salle d'opération
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un, deux, trois... bistouri Technologie, symbolisme et rapports sociaux en salle d'opération L'étude comparative des systèmes médicaux a permis que se multiplient les recherches sur le système biomédical, surtout depuis le début des années 1980. C'est dans la foulée de tels travaux que se situe cette ethnographie des salles d'opération. Construits dans un univers technologique de plus en plus sophistiqué, les rapports de travail entre infirmières, anesthésistes et chirurgiens n'en sont pas moins le produit des multiples facettes des rapports sociaux et de leur dimension symbolique. L'auteur propose d'examiner comment la technologie structure les rapports de travail, dans quel sens les rapports sociaux de la société globale influencent ce qui se passe dans la salle d'opération et jusqu'à quel point les conditions de travail permettent de reproduire les rituels qui s'y déroulent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".