MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027236512 · doi:10.1086/381296

The Overlooked H<scp>ii</scp>Region DA 568

2004· article· en· W2027236512 on OpenAlexaff
C. R. Kerton, Christopher M. Brunt, R. Kothes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMolecular cloudGalaxyStar formationGalactic planeAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the inspection of Canadian Galactic Plane Survey 1420 MHz continuum images of the outer Galaxy we have rediscovered the large, bright, H II region DA 568. Intriguingly, this region does not appear in any of the commonly used catalogs of H II regions and radio sources in the outer Galaxy. After demonstrating how DA 568 was essentially overlooked, we present new radio, infrared, and molecular line observations of the region. We show that, far from being a minor overlooked H II region, DA 568 is actually the most prominent part of a much larger star-forming complex in the Perseus arm of our Galaxy. The complex spans ∼45 × 20 pc, contains over 10 4 M ⊙ of ionized and molecular gas, and includes the BFS 10 H II region and numerous associated IRAS sources. The star-forming complex is apparently quite evolved with most of the original giant molecular cloud having been severely disrupted by the action of DA 568.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207