L’évolution de la composition du mouvement d’immigration au Québec au cours des dernières décennies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Quebec, the statistical indicator considered to provide the most accurate illustration of the immigration movement is one that takes account of the admissions of immigrants as permanent residents. Based on this indicator, the following changes within the movement during the last third of the century (1970-2003) were observed: £ An overall increase in total volume; £ The emergence of two new components: refugees and business people; £ A change in the geographical origin of immigrants: from Western Europe and the United States to North Africa, Eastern Europe and Asia; £ The trend towards the •deconcentration” of the movement on a small number of countries throughout the entire period, which was suddenly reversed in the first years of the 21st century; £ The increased proportion of francophones and allophones in the total volume and the decrease of Anglophones (Francophones and Anglophones are understood here as having a knowledge of French or English as opposed to a mother tongue); £ The emergence of Arabic as the mother tongue most frequently reported by newcomers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".