MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biopolítica e medicalização dos anormais

2009· article· pt· W2027258671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysis Revista de Saúde Coletiva · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo aborda a temática da medicalização dos sofrimentos e das anomalias comportamentais numa perspectiva histórica. Analisa a emergência de uma nova configuração epistemológica do saber psiquiátrico ocorrida na segunda metade do século XIX. Tomando como ponto de partida os estudos sobre biopolítica da população de Foucault e Agamben, as reflexões de Canguilhem sobre as fronteiras difusas da normalidade e o curso que Foucault dedica aos anormais, o artigo estuda o surgimento de uma psiquiatria ampliada relacionada ao não-patológico. São analisados os Anais de Higiene e Medicina Legal e os Anais Médico-Psicológicos, publicados na França entre os anos de 1857 e 1924, com o objetivo de compreender de que modo foi construída essa medicina das condutas e quais foram as estratégias biopolíticas defendidas pelos teóricos da degeneração.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it