MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027293312 · doi:10.1139/z02-093

Photolyase activity of the embryo and the ultraviolet absorbance of embryo jelly for several Ontario amphibian species

2002· article· en· W2027293312 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Malcolm A Smith, Michael Berrill, Carolyn Kapron

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotolyasePyrimidine dimerBiologyEmbryoAbsorbanceDNA repairDNA damageBotanyDNAUltraviolet radiationAmphibianUltravioletCyclobutaneIrradiationBiophysicsBiochemistryGeneticsEcologyRadiochemistryChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organisms whose eggs develop at or near the interface between air and water may be particularly vulnerable to damage from ultraviolet radiation. The primary form of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation damage to biological systems is the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CBPDs) in DNA. The most common method of repairing this damage is photoenzymatic repair via photolyase, whose actions are specific to CBPDs. We utilized a bacterial-transformation assay to estimate the level of photolyase activity of various tissue types in seven species of amphibians collected in south-central Ontario. In this assay, the photolyase activity of a species is measured as the rate of CBPD removal from UV-B-damaged plasmid DNA by cell-free extracts created from the tissue of the species in question. The depth of oviposition and the UV-B absorbance of the embryo jelly, two variables that alter an embryo's in situ exposure to UV-B radiation, were measured to determine whether the level of photolyase activity was correlated with expected UV-B exposure. In vitro measurements of photolyase activity for the seven species were significantly different (F[6]= 10.31, p < 0.0001) and tended to be positively correlated with expected in vivo exposure to UV-B radiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchFrench-language works237,207