MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027294760 · doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2257138

Estimation of Load Disturbance Torque for DC Motor Drive Systems Under Robustness and Sensitivity Consideration

2013· article· en· W2027294760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)EstimatorTorqueSensitivity (control systems)Estimation theoryDisturbance (geology)Noise (video)Robust controlComputer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringControl systemMathematicsElectronic engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents multiple methods for the design of a robust disturbance torque estimator. The benefit of these designs is that they ensure robust estimation in the presence of model uncertainties and/or noise. It is shown that these estimation schemes can be used to estimate both constant and nearly constant disturbance torques. In order to design the observers, the nominal plant model is expanded to incorporate uncertainties. Various cases for the design of the observer are presented. All of the cases are tested on a real system using varying degrees of model uncertainty to ensure that robust estimation is achieved. The results are validated using an in-line torque sensor and are presented accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it