Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgements I am most grateful to Michael Howard and Robert A. Gessert for their help in preparing this article. Notes John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001), p. 3. Denis Richards, Portal of Hungerford: The Life of Marshal of the Royal Air Force Viscount Portal of Hungerford (London: William Heinemann, 1978), p. 305. John C. Ford, ‘Morality of Obliteration Bombing’, Theological Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 1944. Charles Webster and Noble Frankland, The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939–45, Volume 3: Victory (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1961), p. 112. Kate Connolly, ‘Panel Rethinks Death Toll from Dresden Raids’, Guardian, 3 October 2008, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/03/secondworldwar.germany. ‘The Coventry Blitz’, Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital Project, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/chm/outreach/cwhp/events/onelastlook/sites/blitz/. Mike Stickland, ‘Life in Hamburg during WW2’, WW2 People's War,BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/78/a6047778.shtml. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (London: Allen Lane, 1977), p. 323. Michael Burleigh, Moral Combat: A History of World War II (London: HarperPress, 2010), p. 499. Article 51, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977’, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/470?opendocument ‘Fact File: Hiroshima and Nagasaki’, WW2 People's War, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a6652262.shtml. Duncan Anderson, ‘Nuclear Power: The End of the War Against Japan’,BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/nuclear_01.shtml. ‘The History of CND’, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, http://www.cnduk.org/about/item/437. Robert A. Gessert, ‘In the Beginning: A Perspective on the Origin of the Council on Christian Approaches to Defense and Disarmament’, Council on Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament, 15 November 2010, http://ccadd.org.uk/uploads/misc/10paperGessertv2.doc. The origins of the IISS were recounted by Michael Howard in ‘The International Institute for Strategic Studies: The First Thirty Years’, his plenary address to the IISS 30th Annual Conference, in 1988. Michael Howard, Captain Professor: The Memoirs of Sir Michael Howard (London: Continuum, 2006), pp. 158-9. Gessert, ‘In the Beginning’, p. 4. Paul Ramsey, The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1968) and War and the Christian Conscience: How Shall Modern War be Conducted Justly? (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1961). Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars. See essays by CCADD members in Brian Wicker and Hugh Beach (eds), Britain's Bomb: What Next? (London: SCM Press, 2006). An earlier CCADD colloquium is published in Geoffrey Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence (London: St. Martin's Press, 1982). Tanya Ogilvie-White, On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan (Abingdon: Routledge for the IISS, 2011). Brian Wicker, ‘Is There a Case for a British Deterrent in the Twenty-First Century?’, Wicker and Beach, Britain's Bomb; Elizabeth Anscombe, ‘War and Murder’, Richard Wasserstrom (ed.), War and Morality (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1970). David Fisher, ‘Can Deterrence Be Just in the Twenty-First Century?’,Wicker and Beach, Britain's Bomb, and Morality and the Bomb: An Ethical Assessment of Nuclear Deterrence (London: Croom Helm,1985). Michael Quinlan, Thinking About Nuclear Weapons: Principles, Problems, Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 52. David S. Yost, ‘France's Evolving Nuclear Strategy’, Survival, vol. 47, no. 3, 2005, p. 118. Henry D. Sokolski (ed.), Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2004), p. 223. Quinlan, Thinking About Nuclear Weapons, p. 49. These developments and the case for humanitarian intervention are explored more fully in chapter 11 of David Fisher, Morality and War: Can War be Just in the Twenty-first Century? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011). ‘Genocide in Rwanda’, United Human Rights Council, http://www.unitedhumanrights.org/genocide/genocide_in_rwanda.htm. ‘Never Again Programme Transcript’, Panorama, BBC, 3 July 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/4654093.stm. Ibid., p. xi. The Responsibility to Protect, International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001), p. viii. 2005 World Summit Outcome, UN General Assembly, 15 September 2005, p. 31, responsibilitytoprotect.org/world summit outcome doc 2005(1).pdf. Ian Williams, ‘Annan has Paid his Dues’, Guardian, 20 September 2005, http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/sep/20/mainsection.commentanddebate2. Resolution 1973 (2011), UN Security Council, 17 March 2011, http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,UNSC,,LBY,,4d885fc42,0.html. Anthony Pagden and Jeremy Lawrance (eds), Vitoria, Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 286. A victory proclaimed in ‘The Triumph of Just War Theory (and the Dangers of Success)’, Michael Walzer, Arguing About War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004). ‘Conflict in Gaza’, pp. 102–104; ‘Gulf Wars’, pp. 191–220; Fisher, Morality and War. Additional informationNotes on contributorsDavid Fisher David Fisher is the Co-chairman of the UK Council on Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament (CCADD). He teaches ethics and war at King's College, London, having previously served in senior positions in the UK Ministry of Defence, Cabinet Office and Foreign Office. Recent books include Morality and War: Can War Be Just in the Twentieth-first Century? (2011) and Just War on Terror? (2010), which he co-edited for CCADD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it