Does Morality Matter in Security Policy?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgements I am most grateful to Michael Howard and Robert A. Gessert for their help in preparing this article. Notes John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001), p. 3. Denis Richards, Portal of Hungerford: The Life of Marshal of the Royal Air Force Viscount Portal of Hungerford (London: William Heinemann, 1978), p. 305. John C. Ford, ‘Morality of Obliteration Bombing’, Theological Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 1944. Charles Webster and Noble Frankland, The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939–45, Volume 3: Victory (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1961), p. 112. Kate Connolly, ‘Panel Rethinks Death Toll from Dresden Raids’, Guardian, 3 October 2008, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/03/secondworldwar.germany. ‘The Coventry Blitz’, Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital Project, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/chm/outreach/cwhp/events/onelastlook/sites/blitz/. Mike Stickland, ‘Life in Hamburg during WW2’, WW2 People's War,BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/78/a6047778.shtml. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (London: Allen Lane, 1977), p. 323. Michael Burleigh, Moral Combat: A History of World War II (London: HarperPress, 2010), p. 499. Article 51, ‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977’, http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/470?opendocument ‘Fact File: Hiroshima and Nagasaki’, WW2 People's War, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/timeline/factfiles/nonflash/a6652262.shtml. Duncan Anderson, ‘Nuclear Power: The End of the War Against Japan’,BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/nuclear_01.shtml. ‘The History of CND’, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, http://www.cnduk.org/about/item/437. Robert A. Gessert, ‘In the Beginning: A Perspective on the Origin of the Council on Christian Approaches to Defense and Disarmament’, Council on Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament, 15 November 2010, http://ccadd.org.uk/uploads/misc/10paperGessertv2.doc. The origins of the IISS were recounted by Michael Howard in ‘The International Institute for Strategic Studies: The First Thirty Years’, his plenary address to the IISS 30th Annual Conference, in 1988. Michael Howard, Captain Professor: The Memoirs of Sir Michael Howard (London: Continuum, 2006), pp. 158-9. Gessert, ‘In the Beginning’, p. 4. Paul Ramsey, The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1968) and War and the Christian Conscience: How Shall Modern War be Conducted Justly? (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1961). Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars. See essays by CCADD members in Brian Wicker and Hugh Beach (eds), Britain's Bomb: What Next? (London: SCM Press, 2006). An earlier CCADD colloquium is published in Geoffrey Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence (London: St. Martin's Press, 1982). Tanya Ogilvie-White, On Nuclear Deterrence: The Correspondence of Sir Michael Quinlan (Abingdon: Routledge for the IISS, 2011). Brian Wicker, ‘Is There a Case for a British Deterrent in the Twenty-First Century?’, Wicker and Beach, Britain's Bomb; Elizabeth Anscombe, ‘War and Murder’, Richard Wasserstrom (ed.), War and Morality (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1970). David Fisher, ‘Can Deterrence Be Just in the Twenty-First Century?’,Wicker and Beach, Britain's Bomb, and Morality and the Bomb: An Ethical Assessment of Nuclear Deterrence (London: Croom Helm,1985). Michael Quinlan, Thinking About Nuclear Weapons: Principles, Problems, Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 52. David S. Yost, ‘France's Evolving Nuclear Strategy’, Survival, vol. 47, no. 3, 2005, p. 118. Henry D. Sokolski (ed.), Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2004), p. 223. Quinlan, Thinking About Nuclear Weapons, p. 49. These developments and the case for humanitarian intervention are explored more fully in chapter 11 of David Fisher, Morality and War: Can War be Just in the Twenty-first Century? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011). ‘Genocide in Rwanda’, United Human Rights Council, http://www.unitedhumanrights.org/genocide/genocide_in_rwanda.htm. ‘Never Again Programme Transcript’, Panorama, BBC, 3 July 2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/4654093.stm. Ibid., p. xi. The Responsibility to Protect, International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001), p. viii. 2005 World Summit Outcome, UN General Assembly, 15 September 2005, p. 31, responsibilitytoprotect.org/world summit outcome doc 2005(1).pdf. Ian Williams, ‘Annan has Paid his Dues’, Guardian, 20 September 2005, http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/sep/20/mainsection.commentanddebate2. Resolution 1973 (2011), UN Security Council, 17 March 2011, http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,UNSC,,LBY,,4d885fc42,0.html. Anthony Pagden and Jeremy Lawrance (eds), Vitoria, Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 286. A victory proclaimed in ‘The Triumph of Just War Theory (and the Dangers of Success)’, Michael Walzer, Arguing About War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004). ‘Conflict in Gaza’, pp. 102–104; ‘Gulf Wars’, pp. 191–220; Fisher, Morality and War. Additional informationNotes on contributorsDavid Fisher David Fisher is the Co-chairman of the UK Council on Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament (CCADD). He teaches ethics and war at King's College, London, having previously served in senior positions in the UK Ministry of Defence, Cabinet Office and Foreign Office. Recent books include Morality and War: Can War Be Just in the Twentieth-first Century? (2011) and Just War on Terror? (2010), which he co-edited for CCADD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle