MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027316954 · doi:10.1139/t01-112

Compression tests on a slurry using a small-scale consolidometer

2002· article· en· W2027316954 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. W. Bo, V. Choa, Albert Kai-Sun Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoid ratioGeotechnical engineeringPore water pressureSlurryMaterials scienceDissipationVoid (composites)Permeability (electromagnetism)Deformation (meteorology)Water contentComposite materialGeologyThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand the deformation of ultrasoft soil in a viscous state, compression tests were carried out using a small-scale consolidometer equipped with pore-pressure transducers at three locations. Deformation behavior was monitored with both settlement and pore-pressure measurements. The transitional points from slurry to soil were determined from the settlement rate, change in void ratio, change in permeability, and pore-pressure dissipation. It was found that the transitional void ratio determined from the settlement rate is smaller than that determined from the commencement of pore-pressure dissipation. The transitional void ratio varied slightly for samples with different initial moisture contents determined based on pore-pressure considerations. The variation was due to the difference in sample thickness which affected the initiation of pore-pressure dissipation at the bottom of sample. In reality, the void ratio at transition could be larger than those determined from both settlement and pore pressure.Key words: ultrasoft soil, deformation, compression, pore pressure, permeability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207