Bibliographic record
Abstract
A technique of endoscopic sural nerve harvest was devised to minimize the donor site scarring in infants requiring peripheral nerve grafting procedures. The harvests were performed under tourniquet control using three 2-cm incisions for access at the lateral malleolus, midcalf, and popliteal fossa. Endoscopic visualization and blunt dissection of the nerve was achieved with a 4-mm-diameter, 18-cm-long telescope with a 0-degree angle lens, stabilized in an Emory retractor and attached to a video camera. The medial sural nerve was divided in the popliteal fossa proximally under direct vision. The lateral sural nerve was identified and harvested when present. This technique has been in use since 1994 and has been undertaken in more than 200 patients. The most common indication for surgery was obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. No nerve graft injury was noted upon examination under the operating microscope. Postoperative pain, swelling, and ecchymosis were minimal. Most patients have a detectable area of sensory loss at long-term follow-up but are unaware of this finding. Donor site scarring has been aesthetically satisfactory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".