The effects of bone density and disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the lower lumbar vertebral endplates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we hypothesized that vertebral bone density and disc degeneration would affect the structural property distributions of the lower lumbar vertebral endplates (L3-L5). The results may have implications for improving interbody implant designs to better resist subsidence. A 3 mm diameter hemispherical indenter was used to perform indentation tests at 0.2 mm/s to a depth of 3 mm at 27 standardized locations in 55 bony endplates of intact human lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5). The resulting load-displacement curves were used to extract the failure load and stiffness of each test site. Bone density was measured using lateral DEXA scans. Disc condition was determined using a four-point grading scale. Three-way analyses of variance were used to analyze the relationships between the data. The overall failure load decreased with bone mineral density (BMD) in the superior (p < 0.0001) and inferior (p = 0.011) lumbar endplates. In both endplates, the posterolateral regions were significantly stronger than more central regions. With increasing BMD, this difference became more pronounced in the superior endplates only (p = 0.005). Increased disc degeneration was associated with an overall failure load decrease in the inferior lumbar endplates (p = 0.002). The strength in the central regions of the superior endplates was reduced with increasing degeneration, but this was not observed peripherally (p = 0.001). Stiffness magnitude or distribution was not significantly affected by BMD or disc degeneration. The locations of the strongest regions of the endplate did not change with either bone density or disc degeneration. This implies that implant shapes designed using the basic structural property maps for the L3-L5 endplates are appropriate for use in patients with a wide range of pathologies, even though overall failure loads are generally lower in patients with reduced bone density and greater degrees of disc degeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".