Detached-Leaf Method for Propagating <i>Puccinia coronata</i> and Assessing Crown Rust Resistance in Oat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crown rust pathogen Puccinia coronata is an obligate biotroph with wind-disseminated propagules and numerous races. These characteristics make propagation of single-race cultures difficult. Genetic studies using single races in field and greenhouse environments are also problematic because pure cultures can easily become contaminated. In this study, we developed an isolated propagation system for P. coronata and tested its ability to assess host resistance. Oat (Avena sativa) leaf sections (10 cm each) were harvested, disinfested, and suspended in sterile plastic boxes by enclosing 3.5-cm linear sections of each leaf end between 4% agar blocks amended with various chemical constituents. The exposed sections (approximately 3 cm) were inoculated with P. coronata urediniospores suspended in water. Boxes were sealed and incubated in a lighted growth cabinet until the pathogen sporulated. Viable spores were produced on leaves in all treatments, whereas 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and kinetin treatments sustained the leaves longer and yielded the most viable spores. Based on these data, the BAP treatment was adopted and used for additional studies. Detached leaves of differential oat cultivars produced the same reactions as whole plants screened under standard conditions in a growth chamber. The proposed detached-leaf system should be useful for the propagation of numerous single-race cultures of P. coronata as well as evaluation of host resistance under highly controlled conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".