MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027389321 · doi:10.1139/e08-003

A new Jurassic pliosaur from Melville Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago

2008· article· en· W2027389321 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Tamaki Sato, Xiaochun Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchipelagoPaleontologyArcticHolotypeSkullGenusCretaceousTaxonOceanographyBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partial skeleton of a plesiosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Hiccles Cove Formation (Middle Jurassic: Callovian) of Melville Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago, is the first marine reptile fossil with well-preserved skull from the Canadian Arctic and represents a new genus and species of Rhomaleosauridae ( Borealonectes russelli ). The Rhomaleosauridae are a problematic group, and a review of the current status of included taxa is given prior to the description of the Canadian material. The holotype and only known specimen of the new species consists of the skull, anterior cervicals, and right forelimb. The new taxon is characterized by the large prefrontal and the configuration of the postorbital bar in which the postfrontal is excluded from the supratemporal fenestra; these are potentially unique features among rhomaleosaurids. It exhibits a combination of primitive and derived characteristics that are variable among rhomaleosaurids, such as the absence of the dorsomedian foramen and anterior pterygoid vacuity on the palate, and the presence of straight shaft of humerus. The occurrence of this specimen suggests a global distribution of rhomaleosaurids, and it is also significant as one of the few Jurassic plesiosaurs known from North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207