Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–clay nanocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymer–clay nanocomposites based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and montmorillonite were synthesized and characterized. Three different syntheses have been explored: (i) intercalation of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) and in situpolymerization, (ii) clay expansion and in situ oxidative polymerization of EDOT, and (iii) direct intercalation of PEDOT from an aqueous dispersion of it doped with polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT–PSS). The nanocomposites were characterized by various physicochemical techniques, XRD, FTIR, DTA-TG, CHN elemental analysis and SEM. The electrical behaviour of the resulting materials was analyzed by EIS. The dependence of the electrical properties on synthetic procedures has been evidenced as the materials prepared by method (ii) with intercalated and extra-framework PEDOT were the ones which showed better electrical conductivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".