MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027444072 · doi:10.1109/iccse.2014.6926456

Autonomous and cooperative multirobot system for multi-object transportation

2014· article· en· W2027444072 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArtificial Immune Systems Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotComputer scienceTask (project management)Object (grammar)Distributed computingSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceRobot kinematicsAutonomous robotMobile robotHuman–computer interactionReal-time computingEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a multi-robot cooperation algorithm for object transportation, and is inspired by artificial immune system (AIS). The robotic team comprises multiple heterogeneous robots each with a unique set of capabilities. The developed multi-robot system (MRS) is autonomous and fully distributed. The task allocation algorithm allows for concurrent execution of multiple tasks in the system. Tasks in the developed MRS are heterogeneous objects that are randomly introduced to the system. The transportation of an object may only need a single robot or may require multiple cooperative robots. Essentially the developed MRS runs in an unknown, unstructured and dynamic environment. An experimental implementation and test results are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed MRS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Immune Systems ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207