MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027444072 · doi:10.1109/iccse.2014.6926456

Autonomous and cooperative multirobot system for multi-object transportation

2014· article· en· W2027444072 on OpenAlexaff
Pegah Maghsoud, Clarence W. de Silva, Muhammad Tahir Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArtificial Immune Systems Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotComputer scienceTask (project management)Object (grammar)Distributed computingSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceRobot kinematicsAutonomous robotMobile robotHuman–computer interactionReal-time computingEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a multi-robot cooperation algorithm for object transportation, and is inspired by artificial immune system (AIS). The robotic team comprises multiple heterogeneous robots each with a unique set of capabilities. The developed multi-robot system (MRS) is autonomous and fully distributed. The task allocation algorithm allows for concurrent execution of multiple tasks in the system. Tasks in the developed MRS are heterogeneous objects that are randomly introduced to the system. The transportation of an object may only need a single robot or may require multiple cooperative robots. Essentially the developed MRS runs in an unknown, unstructured and dynamic environment. An experimental implementation and test results are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed MRS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Immune Systems ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207