MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2027490280 · doi:10.7202/014507ar

Présentation

2001· article· fr· W2027490280 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marie Fondaire, Daniel Cossette

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quand l'ap pli ca tion d'une loi exige le par te na riat Ma rie Fon daire* Da niel Cos sette** L 'As sem blée na tio nale du Qué bec a adopté, le 18 dé cem bre 1997, la * In ter ve nante au Cen tre de crise le Tran sit, étu diante au doc to rat en Scien ces hu mai nes appli quées, et char gée de cours à l'U ni ver sité de Mont réal.** Di rec teur du Cen tre de crise le Tran sit, porte-parole du Re grou pe ment des cen tres de crise de Mont réal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4580.187

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au Québec→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→