MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027531878 · doi:10.1586/erv.10.147

Menveo<sup>®</sup>: a novel quadrivalent meningococcal CRM<sub>197</sub>conjugate vaccine against serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y

2010· review· en· W2027531878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Cooper, Lisa DeTora, Jeffrey J. Stoddard

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogenicityMeningococcal diseaseConjugate vaccineTolerabilityNeisseria meningitidisMedicineMeningococcal vaccinePopulationImmunologyImmune systemVirologyImmunizationAdverse effectInternal medicineBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meningococcal disease remains a global public health concern despite the wide availability of polysaccharide and polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines. The latter often afford a greater duration and scope of protection compared with the former. A novel quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, Menveo(®) (MenACWY-CRM; Novartis Vacines, Bellaria-Rosia, Italy) has recently been licensed in Europe, the USA, Canada and other countries to protect adolescents and adults against disease caused by serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y. MenACWY-CRM has an immunogenicity and tolerability profile in adolescents and adults supported by an extensive clinical development program. MenACWY-CRM induced immune responses that were at least as good as those induced by Menactra(®) (MenACWY-D; Sanofi Pasteur [Swiftwater, PA, USA]), a quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine) against serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y. Immune responses were also observed in a population of subjects 56-65 years of age. Published information also shows immunogenicity in infants, toddlers and children. Tolerability outcomes were similar for MenACWY-CRM, MenACWY-D and a plain polysaccharide quadrivalent vaccine against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y. Given its potential for protecting infants and persons over 55 years of age, MenACWY-CRM offers promise to fulfil an unmet global need for preventing invasive meningococcal disease in vulnerable populations for which no vaccine is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207