MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027537911 · doi:10.1029/1999jb900387

Mantle variation within the Canadian Shield: Travel times from the portable broadband Archean‐Proterozoic Transect 1989

2000· article· en· W2027537911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Götz Bokelmann, Paul G. Silver

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereMantle (geology)ProterozoicArcheanTransition zoneCratonCrustSeismologyGeophysicsTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report travel times from the Archean‐Proterozoic Transect 1989. This type of data set recorded by a transect of portable broadband instruments allows us to make inferences about mantle structure in the region between the Wyoming Craton and the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. With station separations of 50 to 100 km and frequencies up to 5 Hz the resolution of lateral changes is increased by nearly an order of magnitude over previous studies to a scale that allows us to study the relation between velocity variation in the continental upper mantle, surface geology, tectonic features and age provinces. Travel times of direct and later phases are obtained from waveform matching. The values are corrected for crustal contribution and inverted for the vertical path upper mantle delay δtUM under each station as well as the azimuthal dependence of this quantity. The prominent feature in the upper mantle delays δtUM is the variation by at least 1.5 s for S, much of which occurs over a narrow zone of just a few hundred kilometers width. This suggests a major lateral upper mantle transition which does not coincide with the surface geological edge of the Canadian Shield but is located within the shield. This same transition is also observed in shear wave splitting delay times. Surprisingly, however, the P delays do not exhibit a corresponding variation. We address this apparent contradiction and show how it may be explained in conjunction with anisotropy in the subcontinental lithosphere. A simplified thermal model of the lithospheric transition zone, in which temperature controls the degree of crystallographic alignment and thus seismic anisotropy, predicts this phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207