Antagonism of Eicosanoid- Induced Contraction of Rat Aorta by Sulphonylureas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glibenclamide and other sulphonylureas are extensively used as specific blockers for ATP-dependent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle. However, glibenclamide has recently been shown to inhibit actions of some prostanoids in vascular smooth muscle. We extend our previous study by examining the relaxant actions of five different sulphonylureas in rat aorta. The inhibitory effects of sulphonylureas on the contractions induced by prostaglandins F2 alpha, E2 and D2, norepinephrine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) or potassium chloride (KCl) were examined. Glibenclamide significantly inhibited the contractions produced by prostaglandins F2 alpha, E2 and D2 but was without effect on responses to norepinephrine, 5-HT or KCl. Glimepiride produced significant attenuation of the responses to all agents tested (5-HT, norepinephrine, KCl), although the inhibition of the responses to prostaglandin F2 alpha was most pronounced. Glipizide and tolbutamide had activities similar to that of glibenclamide, while chlorpropamide was devoid of any antagonist action in rat aorta. In rat aorta precontracted with norepinephrine, glibenclamide inhibited the relaxant responses to lemakalim and pinacidil. Thus, in addition to the effect on ATP-dependent potassium channels, glibenclamide inhibits responses to prostaglandins F2 alpha, E2 and D2 but not to other agents. This effect is shared by glimepiride, tolbutamide and glipizide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".