MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027556430 · doi:10.1021/jf0500031

Identification of Antiadhesive Fraction(s) in Nonimmunized Egg Yolk Powder:  In Vitro Study

2005· article· en· W2027556430 on OpenAlexaff
Zeina Kassaify, Esther W. Y. Li, Yoshinori Mine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYolkSalmonella enteritidisSalmonellaEscherichia coliMicrobiologyAntimicrobialChemistryGranule (geology)BiologyFood scienceBiochemistryBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of antiadhesive component(s) in the hen egg yolk against foodborne pathogens was anticipated from results of a previous animal study conducted by the authors. The previous work showed egg yolk powder without specific antibodies is effective in controlling Salmonella enteritidis,Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization in laying hens. Therefore, this study was necessary to locate the activity and identify the effective component(s). In vitro experiments were conducted using confluent Caco-2 cell monolayers. S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium, and E. coli O157:H7 were investigated against the various extracted granule and plasma fractions in three different assays: adhesion elimination, adhesion prevention, and antimicrobial. This study revealed original findings and identified the protective yolk fraction against the foodborne pathogens as the granule component, high-density lipoproteins (HDL). The protective activity conveyed by HDL was confirmed to remain intact despite peptic and tryptic enzymatic digestion and to have antiadhesive but not antimicrobial effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207