MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2027559467 · doi:10.1139/z01-104

The shell glands in some calanoid copepods (Crustacea)

2001· article· en· W2027559467 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roxane-Marie Barthélémy, Corinne Cuoc, Xavier Caubit, Michel Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyExcretory systemUltrastructureExocytosisMerge (version control)CrustaceanAnatomyZoologySecretionCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study represents the first structural, ultrastructural, and biochemical investigation of the shell glands in calanoid copepods. These glands, located inside the points of the last prosomal segment, constitute voluminous syncytial secretory units, each of which extends into an excretory canalicule with a cellular or syncytial wall. The canalicules merge into two collector canals, or shell ducts, that rejoin the oviducts and then open into the egg-laying ducts. Each secretory unit synthesizes heterogeneous granules containing both light and predominantly dense material. Exocytosis of these mature secretory granules occurs in an apical excretory chamber. In freshwater species, the modifications observed during the secretory cycle emphasize a gradual discharge from the secretory units in the hours following laying. Cytochemical and biochemical studies of the secretions reveal the presence of N-acetylglucosamine, galactose, and N-acetylgalactosamine glycoconjugated proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→