MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027567636 · doi:10.1111/oik.01044

Making the right choice: testing the drivers of asymmetric infections within hosts and their consequences for pathology

2014· article· en· W2027567636 on OpenAlexaff
Pieter T. J. Johnson, Janet Koprivnikar, Sarah A. Orlofske, Bryan E. LaFonte

Bibliographic record

VenueOikos · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyParasite hostingAmphibianHost (biology)KidneyVertebrateZoologyEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the ubiquity of bilateral symmetry among animals, a long‐standing mystery centers on why parasites that infect paired organs often do so non‐randomly. Examples from diverse host and parasite taxa continue to accumulate, yet little is known about their causes or implications for host–parasite fitness. We combined field surveys, experimental infections, and parasite choice assays to evaluate both competing explanations for – and consequences of – asymmetric infections of amphibian kidneys by echinostome trematodes, which are widespread and potentially pathogenic infections of larval amphibians. Samples from 6001 hosts representing 26 species indicated that echinostome infections exhibit a consistent, right‐kidney bias, with ˜ 62% of parasites in the right kidney. This pattern could not be explained by variation in kidney size or total infection. Experimental infections of three anuran species reproduced this pattern, with 64% of infections in the right kidney, and indicated it was not the result of differential host or parasite mortality. Based on sequential infection experiments and parasite choice assays, we further showed that earlier infections did not affect the distribution of subsequently colonizing parasites and that echinostome cercariae followed host‐derived cues rather than exhibiting congenital ‘sidedness’. We advance the hypothesis that variation in the position of the right kidney along the anterior–posterior axis controls cue strength in the right nephric duct and thus determines parasite encystment. Correspondingly, anatomical measurements from a subset of larval amphibian hosts revealed that the relative position of the right kidney explained 83% of the variation in infection bias, with no additional contributions associated with kidney volume or host size. We also show that the degree of right‐kidney bias associated positively with host growth in experiments. Morphological asymmetries could therefore function as a unique form of tolerance to mitigate the consequences of infection, despite the oft‐cited costs of asymmetry for mate selection and enemy vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOikosSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207