MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027612430 · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2009.5457674

Bending invariant meshes and application to groupwise correspondences

2009· article· en· W2027612430 on OpenAlexaff
Stefanie Wuhrer, Chang Shu, Jonathan Boisvert, Guy Godin, Pengcheng Xi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshInvariant (physics)GeodesicTriangle meshEuclidean geometryGeometryIntersection (aeronautics)Mesh generationEuclidean distanceMathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsFinite element methodEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a new bending invariant representation of a triangular mesh S. The bending invariant mesh X of S is a deformation of S that has the property that the geodesic distance between each pair of vertices on S is approximated well by the Euclidean distance between the corresponding vertices on X. Furthermore, X is intersection-free. The main advantage of the bending invariant mesh compared to previous approaches is that mesh-based features on X can be used to facilitate applications such as shape recognition or shape registration. We apply bending invariant meshes to find dense point-to-point correspondences between a number of deformed surfaces corresponding to different postures of the same non-rigid object in a fully automatic way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207