MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027628653 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2014.23746

The Value of Registered Nurses in Collaborative Family Practice: Enhancing Primary Healthcare in Canada

2014· article· en· W2027628653 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Vicki Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingHealth carePrimary carePrimary health careValue (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)MedicinePublic relationsPsychologyPolitical scienceFamily medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the current focus on improving efficiencies and quality of care within the Canadian healthcare system, primary healthcare (PHC) is receiving renewed attention. The time is right for highlighting the value that registered nurses (RNs) can bring to collaborative practice in primary care settings. This paper discusses the untapped utilization of RNs in primary care in Canada, arguing for a strong leadership role for nurses and citing examples of RN services that could enhance care and improve population health and cost-effectiveness. Internationally, other countries with strong PHC strategies in place offer potential lessons regarding features that could be adapted in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207