Accurate calibration of a polymer gel dosimeter with a plastic scintillation detector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Three dimensional dose polymer gel dosimetry measurements provide unique information on sophisticated dose distributions. In this study, the authors propose a novel method to improve the accuracy of polymer gel dosimeters by inserting a plastic scintillation detector (PSD) to provide a dose reference. METHODS: PSD dosimeters were calibrated using chromatic deconvolution and then inserted into polyacrylanide gel (PAG) dosimeters. The gel and the PSDs were immersed into water and irradiated with 6 MV wedge filtered beams to obtain a wide range of dose variation. Calibration vials containing the same gel were also irradiated to generate a standard calibration curve. The distribution of magnetic nuclear transverse relaxation rate (R2) values of the gel was determined with a multislice multiecho MRI sequence at 1.5 T. Another calibration curve was obtained by assigning the R2 values in the gel surrounding the scintillators to the dose determined by the PSDs. A reference calibration point from a PSD located in a low dose gradient area served to correct the standard calibration method yielding three novel calibration methods. The results were compared with EBT2 GAFCHROMIC film measurements acquired in the same condition and with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning dose calculations, RESULTS: The mean absolute error of the standard calibration method ranged from 6.1 to 12.4%. The corresponding gamma index (3%/3 mm distance to agreement) criterion was satisfied for only 56% of the pixels in the middle slice of the gel compared to Pinnacle3 dose calculations and to EBT2 film measurements in the center part of the field. Calibration methods using a PSD reduced the mean absolute error to less than 4%; this value was under 2.6% for one of the three methods. In that case, 98% of the pixels satisfied the gamma index criterion. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of PAG dosimeters may be highly improved using one reference dose point measurement using a plastic scintillation detector. The best calibration procedure corrected the slope of the calibration curve derived from the calibration vials to match the R2 value around a PSD calibration, while keeping the R2 value at 0 Gy constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".