Synaptic pattern of sex complements and sperm head malformation in X‐autosome translocation carrier bulls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testicular activity and semen characteristics of bulls carrying an X-autosome translocation t(Xp +;23q-) revealed all stages of spermatogenesis although their semen consisted of few and, exclusively, of malformed spermatozoa. Chromosome painting on metaphase spreads of their mother and synaptonemal complex analysis on these and normal bulls were carried out to test whether the location and meiotic pairing behaviour of the rearranged segments could have contributed to the sperm head malformation and oligospermia in our X-autosome translocation (X-AT) carrier bulls. Spermatocytes of X-AT carriers displayed the rearranged chromosomes in a univalent-trivalent association, with 23q- always remaining as a univalent and Xp + in synapsis with normal chromosome 23 and the Y chromosome. Chromosome painting studies to test whether the total absence of meiocytes showing a quadrivalent is due to the non-reciprocal nature of this translocation, identified Xp sequence homology with the distal end of 23q- confirming its relocation to the terminal segment of 23q-. Our synaptonemal complex analyses also confirmed that the bovine pseudo-autosomal region (PAR) is at the distal ends of Xq and Yp and further revealed that over 85% of spermatocytes of X-AT carriers (and up to 13% of spermatocytes of normal bulls) sustain a Y-axis break adjacent to the PAR. Although the exact cause of a Y-axis break in bovine spermatocytes is not known at present, we believe that the break and possible loss of Yq in such high proportions of spermatocytes of X-AT carriers could have contributed to the sperm head malformation and oligospermia in our X-AT carrier bulls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".