MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027725864 · doi:10.1071/sr08126

Environmental and edaphic drivers of bacterial communities involved in soil N-cycling

2009· article· en· W2027725864 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Forbes, Kris Broos, Jeff Baldock, Adrienne Gregg, Steven A. Wakelin

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdaphicAbundance (ecology)Soil waterEcologyEcosystemRelative species abundanceSoil fertilityCyclingBiodiversityBiologySoil healthSoil organic matterGeographyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cycling of N in soil is supported both directly and indirectly by numerous microbial processes. These processes affect ecosystem fertility, but can also generate forms of N which have detrimental environmental impacts, such as N2O. Understanding drivers of biological communities involved in key N-transformations is therefore of much interest. The effects of physicochemical and environmental properties on the relative size (abundance within total DNA pool) of biological communities involved in 3 key N transformations were investigated. Soils from 14 locations spanning a rainfall gradient across 3 agricultural regions (Clare, Mallee, Balaclava) were sampled, with samples taken from the surface and at depth from each site. Based on PCA of physicochemical and environmental properties, the soils fell into 2 distinct groupings: Clare and Mallee + Balaclava ‘types’. The abundance of functional genes involved in N2 fixation (nifH), ammonia oxidation (amoA), and nitrate reduction (narG) was quantified in DNA extracted from the soils using real-time PCR. The abundance of the nifH gene varied significantly with site (P = 0.03) but not depth, and no regional association with nifH gene abundance was found. Multivariate analysis indicated that the abundance of nifH was positively correlated with soil total C (ρ = 0.382; P = 0.006). Similarly, the abundance of narG varied with site (P < 0.001) and not soil depth. The abundance of narG was positively correlated with increasing rainfall (ρ = 0.417; P = 0.002). The abundance of amoA did not significantly vary between soils, but significantly decreased with soil depth (P = 0.006). The abundance of amoA was negatively correlated with soil electrical conductivity and positively with organic C (combined ρ = 0.44; P = 0.003). Whereas there was no relationship between the abundance of nifH and amoA or narG, the abundance of amoA was positively correlated with the abundance of narG (P < 0.001). These results indicate that the abundance of the N cycling genes is independently affected by different physicochemical or environmental properties. The interactions between soil, environment, and the functionally significant biological communities they support are complex. To gain fuller understanding of soil N cycling, the ecology of the various biological components affecting N-transformations must be investigated simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil ResearchSame topicMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207