MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027741911 · doi:10.1364/ol.40.000419

Needles of light produced with a spherical mirror

2015· article· en· W2027741911 on OpenAlexafffund
Denis Panneton, Guillaume St-Onge, Michel Piché, Simon Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsAxial symmetryOpticsLight beamGeometrical opticsPhysicsRayFormalism (music)Curved mirrorTotal internal reflectionBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe how laterally confined and axially stretched needles of light can be produced by focusing a radially polarized annular optical beam with a spherical mirror. Our analysis is based on an extension of the Richards-Wolf formalism appropriate for nonaplanetic focusing systems operated under nonparaxial conditions. While maintaining their lateral confinement near the theoretical limit of 0.36λ, the needles of light that are produced can extend axially over 1000's of λ, in full compliance with geometrical and electromagnetic considerations. Relationships are established between the thickness of the incident annular beam and the length of the needle of light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207